Autonomous Pentesting

No. Autonomous Pentests do not perform generic scanning or CVE enumeration. They reason through attack paths and execute offensive testing across a defined scope, with human review before any findings are escalated.

Human-grade means the output is held to the same standard as human-led testing. Findings are validated, contextualized, and reviewed by humans before being surfaced. Raw automation output is never delivered directly.

Traditional tools enumerate potential issues and generate large volumes of raw output that require manual triage. Autonomous Pentests focus on validating real attack paths and escalate only actionable findings after review.

Autonomous Pentests can test applications, infrastructure, and cloud environments within a clearly defined scope. Testing is intentionally bounded and controlled.

Autonomous Pentests can be run as a one-time engagement or scheduled on a recurring basis such as monthly or per release. The cadence is flexible and based on how often your environment changes.

Only validated, actionable findings are escalated. Low-signal, theoretical, or non-exploitable issues are suppressed to avoid unnecessary noise.

No. Autonomous Pentests are designed to complement human-led testing, not replace it. Many teams use Autonomous Pentests between No-Stress Pentests to maintain coverage as systems change.

A No-Stress Pentest establishes baseline assurance through deep human-led testing. Autonomous Pentests then provide fast, repeatable validation between those engagements to catch regressions and newly introduced issues.